Topics and Replies

March 31, 2007

Hadith: “The whole Community of the people of Madina used to take the hand of the Prophet and rush to obtain their need with it”

Filed under: Distortions in Translation, Tawassul — Um Abdullah M. @ 9:52 am


The following was written by a brother (
May Allah rewared him) and posted in some Islamic forums
 , with slight changes from me (a person’s name was removed, because I am not sure yet that he is the one who translated it, also added something in translation of narration in Bukhari)

——————————————–

((The first hadith Imam Ahmad related from Anas ibn Malik in his Musnad is:The whole Community of the people of Madina used to take the hand of the Prophet and rush to obtain their need with it.”
Ahmad Musnad 3:98 #11947
Here is the Arabic Text of this hadith of Anas Ibn Malik:مسند أحمد مسند باقي مسند المكثرين أنس بن مالك رضي الله عنه حدثنا هشيم أنبأنا حميد عن أنس بن مالك قال إن كانت الأمة من أهل المدينة لتأخذ بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فتنطلق به في حاجتها))Source of the hadeeths

http://www.sunnah.org/ibadaat/tawassul_3.htm
…..


and many other sufi sites and forums.
At first I was surprised that such hadeeths existed, but after doing self research I found out that the hadeeths was deceitfully translated in english language to fool non arab audience …..
So here is the correct translation….
Whole community of people —- is a Lie.
rush to obtain their need with it —- is also a Lie.

Now lets see the meaning of أمة in English … translated as community.
أمة
also means slave girl

and
إماء
means plural of slave girl. 
Also this hadeeths is not just found in musnad ahmed but also in Ibn Maja, Buhkari, Abi Yala…so lets see what is its correct translation.ماجه
كتاب الزهد
4177- حدثنا نصر بن علي. حدثنا عبد الصمد وسلم بن قتيبة: قالا: حدثنا شعبة عن علي ابن زيد، عن أنس بن ملك؛ قال: إن كانت الأمة من أهل المدينة لتأخد بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فما ينزع يده من يدها حتى تذهب به حيث شاءت من المدينة، في حاجتها.

Majah
Kitaab Al-Zuhd
Narrated Nasir bin Ali, Narrated Abdullah Al-Samad and Salem bin Qatibah: said: Narrated Sha’ab on authority of Ali Bin Ziyad, on authority of Anas bin Malik; Said: A slave girl among inhabitants of Medina, use to seize messenger of Allah’s hand and (messenger of Allah) never withdrew his hand from hers until she takes him wherever she wished.

 


البخاري
كتاب الأدب
5724 – وقال محمد بن عيسى: حدثنا هُشَيم: أخبرنا حميد الطويل: حدثنا أنس بن مالك قال:
كانت الأمة من إماء أهل المدينة، لتأخذ بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فتنطلق به حيث شاءت.
Al-Bukhari
Kitaab Al-Adaab (manners)
Anas bin Malik said, ” A slave girl (from the female slaves of al Madina) among inhabitants of Medina use to take hold of the hand of Allah’s Apostle and take him wherever she wished.”
فهرس مسند أبي يعلى
الجزء السابع
[ 3982 ] حدثنا أبو بكر بن أبي شيبة حدثنا غندر عن شعبة عن علي بن زيد قال قال أنس إن كانت الوليدة من ولائد المسلمين لتجيء فتأخذ بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فما ينزع يده من يدها حتى تذهب به حيث شاءت.Musnad Abi-Ya’la
Vol. 7
Anas bin Malik said, “There used to be a slave girl amongst the girls of Muslim who used to come and seize the hand of Allah’s Apostle and he never withdrew his hand from her hand until she takes him whenever she wished.”

 

فهرس مسند أحمد
مسند أنس بن مالك رضي الله تعالى عنه
- حدثنا عبد الله حدثني أبي حدثنا هشيم أنبأنا حميد عن أنس بن مالك قال:
-إن كانت الأمة من أهل المدينة لتأخذ بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فتنطلق به في حاجتها.
-إن كانت الخادم من أهل المدينة وهي أمة تأخذ بيد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فما ينزع يده منها حتى تذهب به حيث شاءت.
Musnad Ahmed
-Anas bin Malik; Said: “A slave girl among inhabitants of Medina use to take hold of the hand of Allah’s Apostle and take him wherever she wished.”

-There was a servant from among people of medina and she was a slave, who use to take the hand of messenger of Allah and he never use take hand away his until she takes him wherever she wished.

Thats why beg that every muslim brother and sister should learn arabic ….
—————————————

 Note from me: books of hadith today include tashkeel (vowel marks) on the words,  and through the vowel marks one would know that the word is not (Ummah-community), but (Ama-slave girl), they are both written the same but the vowel marks are different.
Also, if one checked the sharh (explanation of the hadith) in books of sharh like Fath al Bari by Ibn Hajar, it clearly states there that it is (Ama) not (Ummah), if the person got the hadith from a source which does not include vowel marks.
Also, would be clear by the narration in sahih al Bukhari in which the plural of the word is in it (Imaa’), which is the plural of (female slave), and not the plural of (Ummah-community).

March 25, 2007

Narration of Malik al Dar, evidence for Tawassul by the living & not by the Prophet after his death

Filed under: Tawassul — Um Abdullah M. @ 9:53 am

Bismillah, wal-hamdulillah was-salatu was-salamu ‘ala Rasulillah.

The incident mentioned in the narration of Malik al Dar happened during the Khilafah of Umar radiyallahu anhu, during the time of drought, and so did the incident of Umar bin al Khattab’s (radiyallahu anhu) tawassul through the Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) uncle, Al Abbas radiyallahu anhu.

I have come across many discussions in regards to this narration, and all of them were concentrating on the “authenticity” of the narration, discussing its chain.

But I have not come across any discussions on the text of the hadith itself, the story,
except for some quotes here and there from some current shaikhs, sited in ahl alhadith forum, and those 2 or 3 points mentioned by those shaikhs led me to research the story of the hadith in classical books of past scholars, and I have found it very interesting and informative.

The things I discovered and read show a totally different understanding of the hadith, than what is understood by many Muslims today including some scholars, it only needs for one to go deep and see where the scholars of the past quoted the narration, in which chapter and what they said before quoting it to understand the real meaning of the hadith.

I will go straight to the points that I have regarding the text and story of this narration of Malik al Dar. After that I will mention some logical arguments in reply to the ones who use this narration as evidence for tawasul that is “asking the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) to make duaa to Allah for us AFTER HIS DEATH.

The text of the narration:

It is related from Malik al-Dar, `Umar’s treasurer, that the people suffered a drought during the time of `Umar (his khilafah), whereupon a man came to the grave of the Prophet and said: “O Messenger of Allah, ask for rain for your Community, for verily they have but perished,” after which the Prophet appeared to him in a dream and told him: “Go to `Umar and give him my greeting, then tell him that they will be watered. Tell him: You must be clever, you must be clever!” The man went and told `Umar. The latter said: “O my Lord, I spare no effort except in what escapes my power!””

Scholars’ understanding of this narration

Hafidh Ibn Hajar al Asqalani -rahimahu Allah- in his books “Fath al Bari” (vol 3 pg. 441):

He sites it in chapter “The people asking the Imam to do istisqa’ in times of drought,” in the chapter heading section, in which he quotes ahadith that have relevance to the chapter heading, and that connect it with hadiths that come under that chapter.

Amongst those narrations he mentions the narration of Malik al Dar, and he only quotes part of the narration, he stops at “go to Umar”. He used this as evidence that people ask the imam to do istisqa (ask for rain) for them in times of drought.

He didn’t mention the rest of the hadith because it has nothing to do with the chapter heading, he only quoted what he believed fits the chapters title, for he says at the end of the section, after mentioning this narration:

From all of this appears the relevance of the chapter heading to the origin of this story
so, al Hafidh Ibn Hajar rahimahu Allah understood from this hadith that the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam was directing the man to go ask the Imam, during that time (Umar radiyallahu anhu), to do istisqa’ for them.

Hafidh Ibn Kathir -rahimahu Allah-:
He sites it in his book “al Bidayah wan Nihaya ” (vol7 pg.104 ), in which he mentions some narrations, right before he mentions Malik ad Dar’s narration, which explain the meaning of the narration.
The narrations before it are by Sayf Ibn Umar, and in them is the mentioning of Umar radiyallahu anhu, after hearing about the man’s dream (who is said to be Bilal al Harith), asking the people on the minbar if they have seen anything bad from him, and then he tells them about the dream that Bilal saw, so they told him:

“Bilal has spoken the truth, so make istiqatha (seek or ask for help) to Allah, then the Muslims”. So then Umar radiyallahu anhu does istisqa’ through al Abbas radiyallahu anhu.
In the second narration, they said “he found you slow in doing istisqa’, so do istisqa’ for us “, so he did.

(Note: these 2 narrations could be weak, but the point is that al Hafidh Ibn Kathir rahimahu Allah mentioned them right before the narration of Malik, showing what it is about, which shows what he understood it to mean, same as what Ibn Hajar (r A) understood from it).

Ala’ ad Deen Ali al Mutaqi al Hindi al Burhan Furi (d. 975) in his book Kanz al Ummal“:
He sites it in chapter of (salat al Istisqa’ – prayer for rain),

and what the man did at the grave of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam was asking for dua, not istisqa’ prayer, and salat al Istisqa’ was done by Umar radiyallahu anhu, when he made tawassul through Al Abbas radiyallahu anhu, thus both narrations are connected to each other, as shown in the previous points.

Conclusion: That the story of Malik al Dar’s narration is connected to the hadith about Umar’s tawassul through al Abbas, all leading to doing istisqa’ through the living, and not through the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam after his death.

 

Narrations with an addition.

There are narrations of the same story, with an addition, if they are authentic (the authenticiy is not known to me so far), they would give very strong support to the understanding of the above scholars.
and it also shows what the scholars who sited the narrations believed the narration to mean.

Imam Ibn Abd al Bar al Maliki in his book “al Isti’ab fi ma’rifat al As-hab”:

The people suffered a drought during the time of ‘Umar (his khilafah), whereupon a man came to the grave of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) and said:”O Messenger of Allah, ask for rain for your Community, for verily they have but perished,” after which the Prophet appeared to him in a dream and told him: “Go to ‘Umar and tell him to do istisqa’ (ask Allah for rain) for the people, and that they will be watered. And tell him: You must be clever, you must be clever!” So, the man went and told ‘Umar, and Umar cried and said “O my Lord, I spare no effort except in what escapes my power!”

Ahmad Abdullah at Tabari (d. 694 ) in his book “ar Riyadh an Nadhirah fi Manaqib al Ashara”:Anas bin Malik narrated:
The people suffered drought during Umar’s time, whereupon a man came to teh grave of the Prophet (Sallallahu alayhi wa sallam), and said: “O Messenger of Allah, ask for rain for your community, for verily they have but perished,”, he said so the Messenger of Allah came to him in a dream and told him “Go to ‘Umar then tell him to do istisqa’ (ask Allah for rain) for the people, and that they will be watered. And tell him: You must be clever, you must be clever!” So, the man went and told ‘Umar, and Umar cried and said “O my Lord, I spare no effort except in what escapes my power!”. narrated by al Baghawi in al fada’il and Abu Umar.

 

 

Logical Arguments


  1. The ones who use this hadith for this type of tawassul say that Umar radiyallahu anhu did not rebuke the man who did istisqa’ at the grave.
    Reply: There is no clear evidence in the hadith indicating that the man told Umar of him going to the grave, but clearly he did tell him of the dream, telling him the message of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.
    so to say that he told him about his istisqa’ at the grave is an assumption, and we can’t use assumptions as evidence.

  2. It didn’t rain until after Umar radiyallahu anhu made istisqa’ by al Abbas radiyallahu anhum.
    If the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam was capable or had permission to do du’aa to Allah after his death, when asked by others, then it would have rained immediately after the man asked the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam at his grave, but it didn’t until after Umar’s istisqa’ through the duaa of Al Abbas radiyallahu anhu.
    This shows that the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam, was guiding the man to ask the Umar to do istisqa’ and not him, hinting to Umar by saying to him “be clever!“, and when Umar did istisqa’ by al Abbas (radiyallahu anhuma) it immediately rained..

  3. If going to the grave of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam to ask him to make duaa to Allah was permissable, Umar radiyallahu anhu would have done that when wanting to do istisqa’ instead of doing it through the uncle of the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wa sallam, who was alive, and Umar’s (r.a) saying “we used to make tawassul through your Prophet’s duaa, and now we do tawassul through the uncle of your Prophet…”, indicates that they don’t make tawassul through the Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) duaa after his death, and only when he was alive, or else why would he say “we used to”?

  4. If what the man did (wether it was Bilal ibn al Harith radiyallahu anhu or someone else) was correct\permissable, then:

    • Why didn’t any of the scholars I quoted mention the narration in a chapter titled (tawassul by the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) or some title indicating that the narration is EVIDENCE for permissibility of that type of tawassul?
      Instead they title the chapter in which the narration is in (salat al istisqa’- the man didn’t do salat al Istisqa’ at the grave, only did duaa, while Umar rA did salat al istisqa) , (The people asking the Imam to do istisqa’ in times of drought),  wouldn’t it be more important to point out the permissibility of tawassul through the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam after his death, which is stronger than doing tawassul through the righteous and ahl al bayt?
      Instead they ignored that part , showing no importance to it at all.
      So if they believed that the narration indicates the permissibility of such a tawassul, why didn’t they at least hint to it by the chapter title or a comment like they did to show that it meant to do intercession through saliheen and ahl al bayt, and ask the imam to do istisqa?

    • What was the point of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam telling Umar r.A “be clever“?

    • If the man told Umar that he went to the grave, and then told him about the dream, why would Umar do salat al istisqa’ when the man already asked the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam to do istisqa’ and he told him that they will be watered?
      Isn’t the istisqa’ of the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam sufficient?

    • If the action of the man was correct (to ask the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam to do istisqa), and the Prophet S.A.W answered his request, then why didn’t it rain immediately after the dream, and instead came down immediately after al Abbas’s (radiyallahu anhu) duaa?
      Who is higher in status, the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam or his uncle?

March 21, 2007

Replying To Haddad’s Review of Kitab Tawhid (4)

Filed under: Replying to Gibril F. Haddad — Um Abdullah M. @ 6:57 pm

Gibril F Haddad said:

“* Misrepresenting a very gharîb narration as being narrated from the Prophet by T.âriq ibn Shihâb whereas it is a mawqûf report of the words of Salmân al-Fârisî narrated by T.âriq. [10] This blunder is due to the fact that Ibn `Abd al-Wahhâb imitated the erroneous claim to that effect made by Ibn al-Qayyim in al-Jawâb al-Kâfî (p. 21) without checking the sources where this report is found such as Ibn Abî `Âs.im’s al-Zuhd, Abû Nu`aym’s H.ilya, and al-Khat.îb’s Kifâya. “

—————–

First:
Allah Ta`ala says :
{يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آَمَنُوا لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ}
{كَبُرَ مَقْتًا عِندَ اللَّهِ أَن تَقُولُوا مَا لَا تَفْعَلُونَ}

061.0032:
O ye who believe! Why say ye that which ye do not?
061.003
It is most hateful in the sight of Allah that ye say that which ye do not.

——————-

GF Haddad continues:
“Worse, Ibn `Abd al-Wahhâb references the report to “Ah.mad” (rawâhu Ah.mad), which means the Musnad of Imâm Ah.mad ibn H.anbal in h.adîth terminology; however, the report is not found in any of the works of Imâm Ah.mad, whether the Musnad, al-Zuhd, or others. It is true that the chain of the report comes through Ah.mad, but to reference the report to him is deception. “

———————-

Imam Ahmad - rahimahu Allah- narrates in his book AL ZUHD

حدثنا عبد الله ، أخبرنا أبي ، حدثنا أبو معاوية ، حدثنا الأعمش ، عن سليمان بن ميسرة ، عن طارق بن شهاب ، عن سليمان قال : « دخل رجل الجنة في ذباب ، ودخل النار رجل في ذباب » قالوا : وكيف ذلك ؟ قال : « مر رجلان على قوم لهم صنم لا يجوزه أحد حتى يقرب له شيئا ، فقالوا لأحدهما : قرب قال : ليس عندي شيء فقالوا له : قرب ولو ذبابا فقرب ذبابا ، فخلوا سبيله » قال : « فدخل النار ، وقالوا للآخر : قرب ولو ذبابا قال : ما كنت لأقرب لأحد شيئا دون الله عز وجل » قال : « فضربوا عنقه » قال : « فدخل الجنة »

also check the reply to Haddad’s review of kitab tawhid (3)

Replying To Haddad’s Review of Kitab Tawhid(3)

Filed under: Replying to Gibril F. Haddad — Um Abdullah M. @ 6:51 pm

G. F. Haddad said:

“* Citing another weak narration that “a Companion” said: “Let us all go seek the help of the Messenger of Allâh (qûmû binâ nastaghîthu birasûlillah) against this hypocrite [`Abd Allâh ibn Ubay ibn Salûl who challenged Abû Bakr to ask the Prophet for a major miracle],” whereupon the Prophet said: “Innahu lâ yustaghâthu bî innamâ yustaghâthu billâh ­ “Help is not sought with me, it is sought only with Allâh.” Ibn `Abd al-Wahhâb references it to al-T.abarânî. [10]
First neither the wording nastaghîthu birasûlillah nor innahu lâ yustaghâthu bî innamâ yustaghâthu billâh is found in any book of h.adîth and there is no chain for them! The reference to “al-T.abarânî”shows blind imitation of Ibn Taymiyya’s incorrect referencing of these wordings to al-T.abarânî’s al-Mu`jam al-Kabîr in al-Radd `alâ al-Bakrî and Majmû` al-Fatâwâ.

Second the correct wording in Ibn Sa`d’s T.abaqât, the Musnad, and al-Jâmi` al-S.aghîr states that Abû Bakr said: “Let us rise to the Messenger of Allâh to seek help (qûmû nastaghîthu ilâ rasûlillah) against this hypocrite” whereupon the Prophet replied: “Lâ yuqâmu lî innamâ yuqâmu lillâh ­ Not for me is redress sought but only for Allâh.” So the reply of the Prophet does not address the means but the motivation and purpose of the Companions against the hypocrite. This is confirmed by another report in which `Umar asks permission to kill `Abd Allâh ibn Ubay ibn Salûl, whereupon the Prophet said: “Leave him lest people say that Muh.ammad kills his companions!”[2] “

———–

First:

In Majma` al-Zawâ’id by al Haythami:
وعن عبادة بن الصامت قال قال أبو بكر قوموا نستغيث برسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم من هذا المنافق فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم انه لا يستغاث بى إنما يستغاث بالله عزوجل.
رواه الطبراني ورجاله رجال الصحيح غير ابن لهيعة وهو حسن الحديث.

rough translation:
Ubadah bin as Samet said: Abu Bakr said: Let us rise/go and seek the help of the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam (nastaghîthu birasûlillah) against this hypocrite, so the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam said: ‘Help is not sought with me,
Indeed, it is Allah Who is to be sought for help (innahu lâ yustaghâthu bî innamâ yustaghâthu billâh)’
Narrated by at Tabarani, and its men are men of sahih except for Ibn Lahi`a, and he is hasan al hadith.

al Haythami rahimahu Allah says it is narrated by at Tabarani, the same wording that is mentioned in kitab at Tawheed, is he also “blindly imitating” Ibn Taimiyyah rahimahu Allah ?

Second:
The wording of the hadith in Ibn Sa`d’s T.abaqât :

أخبرنا موسى بن داود، أخبرنا ابن لهيعة عن الحارث بن يزيد عن علي ابن رباح أن رجلاً سمع عبادة بن الصامت يقول: خرج علينا النبي، صلى الله عليه وسلم، فقال أبو بكر: قوموا نستغيث برسول الله، صلى الله عليه وسلم، من هذا المنافق! فقال رسول الله، صلى الله عليه وسلم، لا يقام لي إنما يقام لله.

The wording in red (underlined in image): (qumu nastaghîthu birasûlillah), NOT (qûmû nastaghîthu ilâ rasûlillah) like Haddad says in his second point.

The wording in Musnad Imam Ahmad rahimahu Allah: حدثنا ‏ ‏موسى بن داود ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏ابن لهيعة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحارث بن يزيد ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏علي بن رباح ‏ ‏أن ‏ ‏رجلا ‏ ‏سمع ‏ ‏عبادة بن الصامت ‏ ‏يقول ‏ خرج علينا رسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏فقال ‏ ‏أبو بكر ‏ ‏رضي الله عنه ‏ ‏قوموا نستغيث برسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏من هذا المنافق فقال رسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏لا يقام لي إنما يقام لله تبارك وتعالى ‏

The wording in red: (qumu nastaghîthu birasûlillah), NOT (qûmû nastaghîthu ilâ rasûlillah).

Note: This is not a reply about the authenticiy of the hadith. It is only to show the false statements of Haddad regarding the wording of the hadith in the books it is narrated in.

March 20, 2007

Replying to Haddad’s Review of Kitab Tawhid(2)

Filed under: Replying to Gibril F. Haddad — Um Abdullah M. @ 8:44 pm

G.F. Haddad says:
“Omitting the phrase “and that I am the Messenger of Allâh (swt) in quoting the h.adîth: “When the Messenger of Allâh sent Mu`âdh (ra) to Yemen, he said: ‘You will come upon the People of the Book, so call them first to testify that there is no God but Allâh (swt) ­ although this phrase is narrated by the totality of the h.adîth Masters except for one (al-Bayhaqî). [5]“.

 

Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdullah Wahhab -rahimahu Allah quotes in chapter 5:

عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما، أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم، لما بعث معاذاً إلى اليمن قال له : ( إنك تأتي قوماً من أهل الكتاب فليكن أول ما تدعوهم إليه شهادة أن لا إله إلا الله – وفي رواية: إلى أن يوحدوا الله – فإن هم أطاعوك لذلك، فأعلمهم أن الله افترض عليهم خمس صلوات في كل يوم وليلة، فإن هم أطاعوك لذلك ، فأعلمهم أن الله افترض عليهم صدقة تؤخذ من أغنيائهم فترد على فقرائهم، فإن هم أطاعوك لذلك فإياك وكرائم أموالهم، واتق دعوة المظلوم، فإنه ليس بينها وبين الله حجاب ) أخرجاه.
Ibn Abbas (May Allah be pleased with him) narrated:
When Allah’s Messenger (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) sent Mu’adh (May Allah be pleased with him) to Yemen, he said, “You will come upon the People of the Book, let your first act be to call them to testify that -There is nothing worthy of worship in truth but Allah.”And in another version of this tradition (it is said):”To single out Allah Alone in the worship, i.e. actualize the Oneness (Tauhid) of Allah-if they obey you in this, inform them that Allah has prescribed for them to offer 5 prayers (Salat) every day and night. If they obey you in this, then inform them that Allah has imposed upon them the duty of Sadaqah (Zakat) to be levied from their rich and distributed to the poor, If they obey you in this, then be careful not to take the best of their properties (as payment of Zakat), and safeguard yourself against the supplication of those who have suffered injustice because there is no veil between his supplication and Allah,”[Al-Bukhari, Hadith No. 1389/1425 and Muslim]
——————————————–

In Sahih al Bukhari = Kitab at Tawhid \ chapter 1

لَمَّا بَعَثَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مُعَاذَ بْنَ جَبَلٍ إِلَى نَحْوِ أَهْلِ الْيَمَنِ قَالَ لَهُ إِنَّكَ تَقْدَمُ عَلَى قَوْمٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ فَلْيَكُنْ أَوَّلَ مَا تَدْعُوهُمْ إِلَى أَنْ يُوَحِّدُوا اللَّهَ تَعَالَى فَإِذَا عَرَفُوا ذَلِكَ فَأَخْبِرْهُمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ فَرَضَ عَلَيْهِمْ خَمْسَ صَلَوَاتٍ فِي يَوْمِهِمْ وَلَيْلَتِهِمْ فَإِذَا صَلَّوْا فَأَخْبِرْهُمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ افْتَرَضَ عَلَيْهِمْ زَكَاةً فِي أَمْوَالِهِمْ تُؤْخَذُ مِنْ غَنِيِّهِمْ فَتُرَدُّ عَلَى فَقِيرِهِمْ فَإِذَا أَقَرُّوا بِذَلِكَ فَخُذْ مِنْهُمْ وَتَوَقَّ كَرَائِمَ أَمْوَالِ النَّاسِ
Volume 9, Book 93, Number 469:
Narrated Ibn Abbas: When the Prophet sent Muadh to Yemen, he said to him, “You are going to a nation from the people of the Scripture, so let the first thing to which you will invite them, be the Tauhid of Allah. If they learn that, tell them that Allah has enjoined on them, five prayers to be offered in one day and one night. And if they pray, tell them that Allah has enjoined on them Zakat of their properties and it is to be taken from the rich among them and given to the poor. And if they agree to that, then take from them Zakat but avoid the best property of the people.”

In Sahih Muslim, Book of Iman \ chapter : CALLING PEOPLE TO TESTIFICATIONS AND THE CANONS OF ISLAM.

عَنْ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍأَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَمَّا بَعَثَ مُعَاذًا إِلَى الْيَمَنِ قَالَ إِنَّكَ تَقْدَمُ عَلَى قَوْمٍ أَهْلِ كِتَابٍ فَلْيَكُنْ أَوَّلَ مَا تَدْعُوهُمْ إِلَيْهِ عِبَادَةُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَإِذَا عَرَفُوا اللَّهَ فَأَخْبِرْهُمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ فَرَضَ عَلَيْهِمْ خَمْسَ صَلَوَاتٍ فِي يَوْمِهِمْ وَلَيْلَتِهِمْ فَإِذَا فَعَلُوا فَأَخْبِرْهُمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ فَرَضَ عَلَيْهِمْ زَكَاةً تُؤْخَذُ مِنْ أَغْنِيَائِهِمْ فَتُرَدُّ عَلَى فُقَرَائِهِمْ فَإِذَا أَطَاعُوا بِهَا فَخُذْ مِنْهُمْ وَتَوَقَّ كَرَائِمَ أَمْوَالِهِمْ

Book 001, Number 0028:
It is narrated on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent Mu’adh towards Yemen (as governor) he said to him: Verily you would reach a community of the people of the Book, the very first thing to which you should call them is the worship of Allah, may His Glory be Magnificent, and when they become fully aware of Allah, instruct them that He has enjoined five prayers on them during the day and the night, and when the begin observing it, then instruct them that verily Allah has made Zakat obligatory for them which would be collected from the wealthy amongst them and distributed to their needy ones, and when they submit to it, then collect it from them and avoid (the temptation) of selecting the best (items) of their riches.


Replying To Haddad’s Review of Kitab Tawhid(1)

Filed under: Replying to Gibril F. Haddad — Um Abdullah M. @ 8:38 pm

GF Haddad says:

* Stating verbatim: ‘The disbelievers who know their disbelief are better-guided than the believers.‘ (inna al-kuffâr al-ladhîna ya`rifûna kufrahum ahdâ sabîlan min al-mu’minîn) [23]

Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdullah Wahhab -rahimahu Allah- says in his book kitab at-Tawheed chapter 23 :

Arabic quote:

وقول الله تعالى : { أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا نَصِيبًا مِنَ الْكِتَابِ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِالْجِبْتِ وَالطَّاغُوتِ وَيَقُولُونَ لِلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا هَؤُلَاءِ أَهْدَى مِنَ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا سَبِيلًا }
[ النساء : 51 ] .

Translation:

Allah the Most Exalted said-translation of the meaning-:
“Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture? They believe in Al-Jibt and At- Taghut (all false deities) and say to the disbelievers that they are better guided as regards the way than the believers (Muslims).”
(4:51)

End of quote.

Then he mentions some other ayat (verses) from Quran and some hadiths.
Then he says at the end of the chapter:

Arabic quote:

فيه مسائل :
…..
الخامسة : قولهم إن الكفار الذين يعرفون كفرهم أهدى سبيلا من المؤمنين .


Translation:

Important issues of the Chapter

……

5) Their saying that the disbelievers who are well aware of their Kufr (disbelief) are on a more correct and guided path than the believers.

End of quote.

As you can see, Shaikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab says: “THEIR saying” then mentions the statement that G.F. Haddad accuses the Shaikh of saying.

Now, who are the ones who said that statment ?
we go back to the tafsir of the ayah (explanation of the verse) to know who they are.

Ibn Kathir rahimahu Allah says in tafsir of that ayah [4:51] (quoted at the begining of the chapter which is related to point 5 in “important issues of the chapter” ):

(Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture They believe in Jibt and Taghut).
……

(and say to those who disbelieve, “These people are better guided on the way,” than the believers.) preferring the disbelievers over Muslims, because of their ignorance, un-religious nature and disbelief in Allah’s Book which is before them. Ibn Abi Hatim recorded that `Ikrimah said, “Huyay bin Akhtab and Ka`b bin Al-Ashraf (two Jewish leaders) came to the people of Makkah, who said to them, `You (Jews) are people of the Book and knowledge, so judge us and Muhammad.’ They said, `Describe yourselves and describe Muhammad.’ They said, `We keep relation with kith and kin, slaughter camels (for the poor), release the indebted and provide water for the pilgrims. As for Muhammad he is without male children, he severed our relations, and the thieves who rob pilgrims (the tribe of) Ghifar follow him. So who is better, we or him’ They said, `You are more righteous and better guided.’ Thereafter, Allah

sent down,
(Have you not seen those who were given a portion).” This story was also reported from Ibn `Abbas and several others among the Salaf. Allah’s Curse on the Jews This Ayah [4:52] contains a curse for the Jews and informs them that they have no supporter in this life or the Hereafter, because they sought the help of the idolators. They uttered this statement [in Ayah 4:51] to lure the disbelievers into supporting them, and they ultimately gathered their forces for the battle of Al-Ahzab, forcing the Prophet and his Companions to dig a defensive tunnel around Al-Madinah. But, Allah saved the Muslims from their evil,


So the ones who said that statment were the Jews, and Shaikh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab rahimahu Allah was mentioning the false evil statement the Jews made, which is mentioned in the first ayah quoted in the chapter.

Replying to G F Haddad’s Book Review of Kitab Tawhid

Filed under: Replying to Gibril F. Haddad — Um Abdullah M. @ 8:06 pm

Who is G. F. Haddad ?

Gibril/Gabriel Fouad Haddad

A Naqshabandi Sufi, with Ashari creed

born in Beirut in 1380/1960.

He embraced Islam while a graduate student in French Literature at Columbia University in New York. He lives in Damascus, Syria.

Two of his teachers are Hashim Kabbani & Muhammad Nazim al Haqqani

==================================

Insha Allah I will be replying to his book review:

Kitâb al-Tawh.îd al-Ladhî Huwa H.aqqullâh `alâ al-`Abîd
by Muh.ammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhâb

Translated into English by UnknownRyadh: Darussalam Publications, 1996.
Book review (upd.)by GF Haddad ©

by using the Arabic text of the book since the accusations are directed towards the Shaikh -rahimahu Allah- and his book regardless of which translation G F Haddad used to attack the book , because GF Haddad knows Arabic and can read the Arabic text.

Blog at WordPress.com.